Singapore proxy bet ban likely precautionary: experts

Singapore’s decision to criminalise proxy gambling involving anyone not physically present in a casino or slot hall premises in the city-state, was mostly about tying up a loophole left in earlier legislation, several industry commentators told GGRAsia.

“I think Singapore wants to exercise the tightest possible control over its casino licensees,” said David Green.

He added, referring to the process that led to the city-state’s Casino Control Act in 2006, and then the opening of two casino resorts in 2010: “Legalisation in 2005 was premised on the minimisation of harm and the prevention/elimination of criminal influence from the casinos.”

Mr Green is founder of Newpage Consulting Ltd and a former gaming regulator in Australia. He is also a former adviser to the Macau government on gaming.

Singapore has a casino duopoly, split between Marina Bay Sands, run by a unit of United States-based Las Vegas Sands Corp, and Resorts World Sentosa, operated by Genting Singapore Ltd.

Industry consultant Ben Lee told GGRAsia that in his opinion, “Singapore has the tightest anti-problem gambling measures in the world,” in addition to an entry levy applicable to Singapore citizens and permanent residents.

“This looks like another step” in the “direction,” of firmer control he added, referring to the proxy gambling issue.

Mr Lee is founder of casino industry consultancy IGamiX Management & Consulting Ltd.

Source: https://www.ggrasia.com/singapore-proxy-bet-ban-likely-precautionary-experts/